Page 38 - CMA Journal (Sep-Oct 2025)
P. 38

Focus Section
             Balancing the Scales: Pakistan’s Tariff Reforms at the

                 Crossroads of Protectionism and Competitiveness













              Tariffs have been the core element of trade policy in   term since businesses
              Pakistan, which has influenced its economic perfor-  would have no incentive
              mance. In the past, the country has heavily relied on   to innovate, enhance
              import tariffs as the main source of fiscal revenue, a habit   production, and ascend
              that has led to a high level of structural dependency   the value chain any
              within the economy. This dependency has not been free;   longer. Conversely, the
              it has led to the discouragement of investment, increased   case of export orienta-
              production costs, and reduced competitiveness of local   tion is concerned with
              industries. It is necessary to convert tariffs into a revenue   liberalisation and special
              generator and a strategic trade-enabling tool to achieve   state  support.  The
              sustainable growth and competitiveness worldwide.¹ The   international  competi-
              tariff policy — re-symbolized by efficiency, transparency,   tion also compels firms
              and export promotion — can help Pakistan develop a   to  become   more
              more predictable business environment, facilitate indus-  efficient and productive   Dr. Azeema Usman
              trial growth, attract investment, and promote integration   and export receivables
              into global value chains.¹ During the 1950s–60s, import   enhance the foreign   Assistant Manager
              substitution contributed to the formation of local   exchange reserves and   (Research and Publications)
              production potential; later (in the late 1960s and early   create macroeconomic   Saviours, Karachi
              1970s), export performance (especially in the textile   stability.³,4
              industry) contributed to the growth of the industry.
                                                                Prudently, tariffs may be used as boosters of economic
              However,  the   low-productivity  segments  were
              entrenched by prolonged protection, weak competition,   growth, reducing the price of inputs and improving the
              policy uncertainty in certain periods, and the disincentive   competitiveness of local industries, especially those that
              to upgrade exports. A glimpse through the history of   have an export-oriented character.5 Acknowledging this
              trade policy in Pakistan indicates periods when protec-  fact, Pakistan has made a significant change with the
              tion provided interim rents, but no long-term productivi-  National Tariff Policy (NTP), which the Federal Cabinet
              ty gains were realised unless competitive exposure   passed on November 19, 2019.  The policy marked a
              occurred and complementary policies (infrastructure,   change of course because, instead of treating the tariff as
              skills, finance) were in place. ²                 a revenue collection instrument, as was historically the
                                                                case, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) now treats it as
              Balancing Protectionism and
                                                                an instrument for industrialisation and export promotion.
              Export Orientation                                The previous version tended to cause informal modifica-
                                                                tions, policy instability, and uncertainty in trade, which
              The import substitution versus export orientation debate
                                                                were detrimental to long-term business planning.
              represents two different approaches to industrial devel-
              opment.  The proponents of the import substitution
                                                                To institutionalise transparency and coherence, the NTP
              program claim that infant industries are not yet at the
                                                                established the Tariff Policy Board (TPB) and the Tariff
              level where they can compete globally and thus a protec-
                                                                Policy Centre (TPC) within the Ministry of Commerce. The
              tionist policy is needed to develop the infant industries in
                                                                TPB is required to develop, revise, and supervise the
              terms of scale, experience, and technology. It can also
                                                                application of the National  Tariff Policy, whereby any
              protect employment by providing local manufacturing
                                                                changes to customs or regulatory duties are made by
              jobs, thereby improving the economy's security against
                                                                conducting extensive consultations with stakeholders.
              changes in the global market. Moreover, temporary
                                                                Such a structural reform is a crucial step toward achieving
              protection can help stabilise the balance of payments by
                                                                a predictable, evidence-based, and business-friendly
              mitigating excessive pressures due to imports during
                                                                tariff regime that will support the overall trade and
              structural adjustment. However, it can be counterintui-
                                                                industry objectives of Pakistan.6
              tive to persist with protectionist measures in the long
              36    ICMA’s Chartered Management Accountant, Sep-Oct 2025
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43